There was an interesting article in yesterday’s LA Time’s that gives a timely perspective on the proliferation of e-textbooks in the student market. The crux of the argument is that e-textbooks, although half the price of print textbooks, may actually not be cheaper in the long run. Students can usually return their print textbooks for 50% of what they initially paid and 3/4 of students, recently surveyed, said they would not read e-textbooks on their computer and would instead print them out. Therefore in the long run, the price of e-textbooks may actually be more expensive.
I am going to disagree with the general thesis here and say that e-textbooks are in fact cheaper, however the publishing industry needs to be innovative about how they package and distribute these products. Firstly, I am going to disagree with the fact that students can return their books for 50% of the face value. I am not too far removed from my university years to remember going back to the campus bookstore with a bundle of textbooks cradled in my arms hoping to come home with a nice sum of cash. Year after year I would be dissapointed by the measly amount of money I was refunded and in some cases the amount was so negligable that I chose to keep the textbook. Therefore to base an argument on the fact that students are receiving 50% of the money they spend on physical textbooks back seems flawed.
On another note educational publishers, like Taylor and Francis, are becoming very innovative in the ways that they are packaging their textbooks for students. Students can now pick and choose which chapters of the textbook they want to buy instead of forking out $1000 for the entire book. Many professors will only assign a handful of chapters as requird reading for a given semester and by only buying the chapters they need, students can greatly reduce the money they spend on textbooks.
Finally I need to address the fact that 3/4 of unviersity students said they do not feel comfortable reading textbooks on their computer and instead would opt to print them out. There are two points that need to be made here. Firstly, as e-readers become widely available (Amazon may actually be creating a Kindle specifically designed for students … think easy highlighting and in-line note taking) students will find that they only need to pay for the upfront cost of the reader and that reading using tools like the Kindle are actually even more comfortable than reading on printed paper. This will greatly reduce the cost of going to the copy shop and printing out an entire book. However, publishers must not disregard the fact that 75% of students said that they would not feel comfortable reading on a computer screen. Most students in the early days will not buy Kindles and the publishers and e-book distributors need to find ways of making students more comfortable reading on their screens if they want to make e-books economically attractive. This has been a major topic of focus for us here at Spreed. We are dedicated to the field of eye science to understand how the end-user receives information from a monitor. We have developed a very unique way of displaying text on a screen so that students may find it far easier to read their textbooks on their computer instead of printing them out. Publishers must search to find ways of presenting their textbooks on computer screens in a way that students will not feel the need to run to the copy shop.
The bottom line is that the article really only gives one side of the story and does not look too far into the future. The trends are pretty clear and as publishers and students become more comfortable with this changing industry, we will find that e-textbooks are far cheaper and superior in quality to the printed textbooks of the paste. However, please take a look at the LA Time’s article that can be found below and come back here to leave your thoughts on this topic.
E-textbooks may not be cheaper than printer ones, report says: LA Times
A sharply critical report released Monday asserts that commercial publishers are going about the digital textbook revolution the wrong way. Commercial e-textbooks are no cheaper than hard-copy editions when you take into account that students can sell print books back to the bookstore for half the cover price, according to the report from a national coalition of student public interest research groups. And restrictions on printing and online access make commercial e-books unfeasible for many students, the report said.
Some comments on what you said.
You did not say if you read the report in question though. The E-Textbooks are not that cheap at all. Printing a good portion of the book can easily wind up being costly in the long run.
I can agree with you on returning college textbooks and getting less than what you thought you might get back and sometimes getting nothing back as the book gets used for only one semester. With an E-Textbook you get no money back.
The report says 75% of E-Textbook they looked at have 180 day subscriptions which is not good cost wise if the E-Textbook can be used for more than one semester.
You do talk about a kindle, but unless they can come out with a color monitor version some college textbooks, like a medical textbook, will not look great on it.
I suggest a using tablet PC instead.
E-textbooks are new, but the price of the books need to come down a bunch though before you get more of an adoption.
Of course the LA Times article is wrong. We all love travelling around in open horse and cart. Ho, hum! However the responsibility for changing the paradigm rests with the electronic publishers who have the muscle. Don’t forget that reading paper books is engrained into our psyche from a very young age sometimes pre-school. The EPs may not invent the shift but they certainly need to keep tabs on the moves forward and support them. While I love books I also recognize that with the information overload that is going on, we have to find better ways to absorb and track the right information. I look forward to reading the LA Times article presented in the right way and with a forward looking solution.
It looks like you are a real expert. Did you study about the matter? hrhr